News

“We need to reevaluate how [the U.S. armed forces] fight,” David Johnson, senior fellow at the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, said at the AUSA conference. He asked what key capabilities are needed to keep above the brigade and offered that things like electronic warfare can’t be fielded at the brigade level.

Bryan Clark, a senior fellow at the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, advocates for adding the local air defense requirement. He led one of three congressionally mandated alternative fleet architecture studies recently completed by the Navy, and Clark's report advocates for building guided missile frigates. He said the proliferation of anti-ship cruise missiles and the advances in cruise missile technology necessitate the frigate defending other friendly ships from such threats. "Those things drive you to having to maybe make the air defense mission a more explicit consideration in the design of the ship," Clark told ITN April 26. If the frigates are able to protect convoys and other ships from air threats, according to Clark, the Navy's guided missile destroyers could be freed up to focus on ballistic missile defense and other missions.

When considering Australia’s future in Asia, many of us have had difficulty looking beyond China—but we have many better options in Asia. At the core of our misperceptions are six myths about the potential for cooperation with Beijing.

Armed with the Aegis Combat System, Arleigh Burkes are a multi-mission guided missile destroyer that can alternatively serve in missile defense, anti-submarine warfare and counter-piracy capacities explained Bryan Clark, a senior fellow with the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments (CSBA), a DC-based think tank. “The Arleigh Burkes, especially the new ones, are the front line ship that the Navy uses for the bulk of its missile defense and security cooperation type missions,” said Clark. “The Aegis Weapons System is fundamentally a missile defense system, so the Arleigh Burkes are really doing the mission today that they were originally envisioned to do.”

This is broadly consistent with the vision for future Amphibious Operations that the Center for Budgetary and Strategic Assessments (CSBA) articulated a recent Fleet Architecture Study ordered by the U.S. Senate to guide future Navy acquisitions and organization. CSBA’s report has the Navy and Marine Corps working together to ensure Navy access by eliminating adversary weapons and sensors in littoral areas through amphibious raids, establishing expeditionary bases for logistics, surveillance, and fire support, and providing direct fire against adversary surface ships. The idea, articulated more directly by CSBA, is to be able to turn islands and archipelagos into barriers against adversary power projection.

Three Congressionally mandated “fleet architecture” studies published in February explored alternative designs compared to the make-up of today’s Navy. One study was done by the CNO’s staff, although officials say that report is not an official service position. The two other studies were completed by the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, and the MITRE Corp., respectively.