In the News

Threats Grow, but So Do Navy Ship Costs

  • June 17, 2016
  • Nick Blenkey
  • Marine Log

Even before it was formally submitted as the Annual Long-Range Plan for Construction of Naval Vessels for Fiscal Year 2016, a draft of the Navy’s latest shipbuilding plan was floating around Washington and being seen by defense commentators as likely to have a short shelf life. 

In the News

Marine Corps Moves Forward On King Stallion Program

  • June 15, 2016
  • Yasmin Tadjdeh
  • National Defense Magazine

IOC “can’t come soon enough” for the Marine Corps, said Jesse Sloman, an analyst at the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, a Washington, D.C.-based think tank.

Analysis

Undersea Cables and the Future of Submarine Competition

  • June 15, 2016
  • Bryan Clark
  • Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Volume 72, Issue 4, 2016

Today, nearly all voice and Internet traffic, including essential military and financial transmissions, travels through undersea fiber-optic cables. Even temporary damage to these lines of communications can have serious consequences, which is why their future security depends on how well nations understand and exploit the next wave of submarine technology.

In the News

China Now Has a Flying Propaganda Machine

  • June 14, 2016
  • David Axe
  • Daily Beast

If China ever attacked Taiwan, psyops—and, more specifically, the Gaoxin-7 planes—would probably play a major role in the fighting. The PLA “would likely seek to broadcast disinformation and propaganda across Taiwanese military networks, spreading confusion and encouraging Taiwanese troops to desert or surrender,” Jim Thomas, John Stillion, and Iskander Rehman wrote in a 2014 report for the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments.

In the News

Analysts: It’s Time for a Reexamination of Nuclear Weapons Requirements

  • June 13, 2016
  • Sandra I. Erwin
  • National Defense Magazine

Defense analyst Evan Montgomery, of the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, said the world is now in the midst of a “second nuclear age,” one that is arguably more complex and potentially more volatile than the bipolar U.S.–Soviet struggle of the Cold War.

  • Type

  • Expert