An effort to modernize the U.S. nuclear force, from bombs to ballistic missile submarines, is affordable despite estimates the cost could be as high as $1 trillion over 30 years, according to a new study by a Washington think-tank.
U.S. military power often is measured by the number of combat aircraft and ships in the inventory. While the United States has by far the largest air force and navy, that size advantage could eventually be negated by enemy air defenses and electronic warfare technologies that are now available in the open market.
The US military is overly invested in short-range direct attack bombs and not enough in long-range, stealthy smart weapons and aircraft, and this must change if it ever expects to challenge the air defences of nations like China, Russia, Iran or North Korea.
NEWPORT, R.I. – Andrew F. Krepinevich, Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, discusses security challenges and the resources we have to deal with them at the 66th annual Current Strategy Forum hosted by U.S. Naval War College, June 16-17, 2015.
On May 20, 2015, the Sasakawa Peace Foundation hosted Dr. Andrew F. Krepinevich, President of the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments on “The Future of U.S. Defense Strategy and the Japan-U.S. Alliance”
The size and scope of the U.S. military is already becoming an issue on the presidential campaign trail. During his presidential campaign kickoff speech, former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush criticized the Obama administration for leaving the military to wither.
1667 K Street NW Suite 900
Washington DC, 20006
202-331-7990
info@csbaonline.org
