In the News

Corporate Downsizing Comes To The Pentagon

  • October 8, 2011
  • Foreign Policy Magazine

/…/Just like General Motors and many other previously labor-intensive businesses, the Pentagon has a labor cost problem. And just like Corporate America, the solution to the Pentagon’s labor cost problem will be the substitution of new weapons for soldiers, in an attempt to get more national security output per troop. The Army and the Marine Corps, the most labor intensive of the services, should brace for the bad news to come/…/

In the News

Republican Hawks Use Sharp Rhetoric to Fight Deeper Pentagon Budget Cuts

  • October 2, 2011
  • the Hill

Republican lawmakers are using increasingly sharp rhetoric to argue against additional cuts to defense spending, warning the military will cede its technical edge, manufacturing will further erode and conscription will return/…/Republican lawmakers are not alone in using sharp language. Industry executives say their firms likely would soon lack the work to retain an ability — and workforce — to design new combat systems. For instance, James Albaugh, Boeing’s commercial aviation chief, told reporters last month that there could soon come a time when few weapons manufacturers have the in-house engineering brainpower to design a new combat aircraft from scratch.

In the News

White House Cuts $25 Billion More From Defense to Fund VA

  • September 30, 2011
  • Bloomberg

The White House has directed the Pentagon to reduce its 10-year spending plan by another $25 billion, on top of the roughly $450 billion it’s already planning to cut, according to three government officials/…/The Office of Management and Budget directed the action because the White House decided to protect Veterans Administration medical funding from cuts, said one the officials/…/

In the News

How Bad Would Sequestration Be For Defense?

  • September 29, 2011
  • National Journal

Just how bad would sequestration be for the Pentagon? No one argues that the roughly $500 billion across-the-board defense cut that would be triggered if the super committee fails to agree on a plan to reduce the nation’s deficit by at least $1.2 trillion equates to a worst-case scenario for the department. But the extent of the damage that could be done to the military with a cut of that size is a topic that is still up for debate/…/

In the News

Generational Shift for Joint Chiefs

  • September 29, 2011
  • Politico

Adm. Mike Mullen and the man who replaces him Friday as chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff are just five years apart in age but their experiences are different in ways that represent a dramatic shift at the top of the nation’s armed forces.

In the News

Affect on Dyess Unclear If Military Spending Reductions Kick In

  • September 28, 2011
  • Abilene Reporter-News

The number of Air Force bombers and transport planes will shrink dramatically, military families will suffer, and Texas will especially feel the pain if Congress doesn’t agree on overall budget cuts, according to a Republican report.The reason is that if the overall cuts aren’t made, automatic reductions in military spending kick in/…/

  • Type

  • Expert