CSBA in the News

Momentum has been gathering to make considerable reductions in the defense budget. “If Gates has cut away the fat” from much of military spending, “then increasingly we’re cutting away at muscle,” says Andrew Krepinevich, president for the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessment in Washington.

The job facing the next U.S. defense secretary just became a little more daunting. In addition to overseeing operations in Iraq, Afghanistan and now Libya, the successor to Defense Secretary Robert Gates will likely walk into the job at the end of the summer just as the Pentagon wraps up a “fundamental” review of its missions and capabilities to help identify $400 billion in savings in security spending over the next 10 years/…/ “If this is really going to influence the FY 13 budget, then they’re going to need to finish the review by June or July,” said Todd Harrison, a senior fellow for defense budget studies at the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments/…/”The new defense secretary is going to have a steep learning curve,” and that probably means Deputy Defense Secretary William Lynn will end up doing a lot of the heavy lifting, Harrison said. “He would ideally provide a lot of the continuity between Gates and whoever follows him.”

Libyan rebels will soon be bolstered by the efforts of some 30 to 40 military advisors from Britain, France, and Italy. Critics argue that such a small force can hardly turn the tide of a conflict that seems to be running against the NATO-backed rebels, but in the past such advisory missions have often served as significant force multipliers.But there may be more to these advisors than meets the eye/…/“The number of advisors need not be large at all depending on the objectives to be achieved,” said Dakota Wood, a retired lieutenant colonel in the US Marine Corps and senior fellow at the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, in an interview with Bellum. He cited the exploits of Lawrence of Arabia during World War I, various CIA efforts during the Cold War, and most recently US support to the Northern Alliance just after the September 11th attacks. Even in small numbers, Mr. Wood explained, advisors “can have a disproportionate impact on the effectiveness of such a group.” They will provide a key link between the rebels and the capabilities of the NATO coalition — reconnaissance, intelligence and so forth — and, in reverse, provide the Western allies with “real-time intelligence of actual conditions” within the rebel movement. Further, the Libyan rebels have virtually zero experience, are poorly organized, lack discipline, and have proven unable to coordinate their actions in any meaningful, sustained manner. Mr. Wood argued that the advisory mission would present the rebels with an opportunity “to better organize their fight.” Politically, it also gives the nations involved a way to demonstrate their commitment without deploying ground troops.

Future unmanned aircraft will have to be designed to fly over hostile areas where an enemy would actively challenge their presence, a panel of three U.S. Air Force officers said/…/ The Air Force  cannot take the air bases it operates UAVs out of for granted. Such bases might come under attack from enemy forces, which would necessitate developing unmanned jets with greater range and persistence to enable such aircraft to operate from outside the range of those potential threats, said Mark Gunzinger, an analyst at the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments in Washington. However, communications could be the deciding factor for future unmanned aircraft.”Stealth technology is such today that we can make platforms that are much, much more survivable,” he said.

Defense Secretary Gates said weeks ago that the $78 billion in cuts proposed were as much as the Pentagon budget could absorb. So now, with President Obama calling for $400 billion more, there’s a lot of talk in the military and on Capitol Hill about where these cuts could come from. CSBA’s Todd Harrison weighs in on the proposed cuts.

After the last Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR) failed to prioritize capabilities or missions, defense observers are not confident this new review will be any different/…/Todd Harrison, a senior fellow for defense budget studies at the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, suggested an independent board be appointed to perform the review, lest each service fight to preserve its own turf and force structure. As an example, he pointed to President Dwight Eisenhower’s competitive Solarium Project of 1953, where three independent teams crafted separate security policy options. Their work eventually led to Eisenhower’s New Look policy, which tried to balance military capabilities with the country’s financial resources in the 1955 budget.