News

Countries are increasingly open to international collaboration to save money and still build capability. “There are efforts afoot for countries to come together to meet requirements as a coalition,” notes Skot Butler, vice president of satellite networks and space systems for Intelsat General. Butler leads Intelsat General’s work with the DoD, NATO, various civil agencies, and commercial enterprises in the U.S. and Europe. “I’m aware of a number of initiatives where one country has a requirement but not enough to justify a program on their own and we bring them together with an ally in the region to host their requirements on a commercial satellite,” he says.

U.S. combat air forces are ill equipped to fight a technologically empowered enemy, and it could be years or decades before the Pentagon deploys more advanced weapons. Such is the grim picture painted in a new study by the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments. The authors, retired Air Force Lt. Gen. David Deptula and CSBA analyst Mark Gunzinger, make the case that aviation forces are not up to the challenges of 21st century warfare and the Pentagon has only itself to blame.

The Defense Department and Congress should give preference to fielding long-range intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR) and strike aircraft to bolster the U.S. military posture in the Asia-Pacific and enable it to project power rapidly, according to a report from an influential Washington think tank.

Washington must take another look at its plans to “rebalance” the Air Force in the coming decades, two air power advocates warned Monday, or it could regret a missed opportunity to expand American global power.

The Pentagon should plan to build 170-plus Long Range Strike – Bomber aircraft rather than the 80-100 in current plans, and should reconsider its $550-million unit cost ceiling for the aircraft, according to a new report from the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments. The report’s authors are veteran USAF strategist Lt Gen David Deptula, who retired as the service’s chief of intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance programs in 2010, and the CSBA’s Mark Gunzinger.

While the United States has built up a capable portfolio of combat airpower that has provided a key advantage over its adversaries since World War II, the Pentagon and Congress must rebalance this force, argued the authors of a new Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments report on Monday. Speaking at an event sponsored by AFA's Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies in Arlington, Va., Mitchell Institute Dean David Deptula and CSBA Senior Fellow Mark Gunzinger said the time to re-examine US combat air forces is now, as challenges to the traditional ways America projects power are proliferating. With the rise of anti-access, area-denial threats, and a growing emphasis on the Asia-Pacific region, Gunzinger said, future needs focus more acutely on fielding new long-range intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance airplanes and strike aircraft that could give the United States greater ability to project power farther and more quickly. Slowly, Defense Department officials are realizing they need to address these areas as evidenced by the priority given to the Air Force's Long-Range Strike Bomber, said the pair. But the Navy also needs to invest in stealthy, refuelable unmanned combat airplanes to keep aircraft carriers relevant in A2/AD environments.