News

Federal law includes two bodies of code applicable to warfare. Title 10 contains laws exclusive to the U.S. armed forces - notably the Uniform Code of Military Justice Title. Title 50 relates to definitions of war and espionage, and the government's responsibilities in the event of armed conflict. "Traditionally, operations in countries with which the U.S. is not at war are conducted under Title 50, not Title 10," said Jim Thomas, an expert in political-military relations who is vice president for studies at the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments. "What you've seen since 9/11," Thomas said, "is a blurring of Title 50 and Title 10."

A look at the salaries Navy Seals get from the government, with Todd Harrison, CSBA.

A House panel has proposed legislation that would require a competitive engine acquisition strategy for the Air Force's next-generation, long-range strike program, which could open up a new battle between lawmakers and the Pentagon over dueling jet engines/.../ Mark Gunzinger, a senior fellow at the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments and a former senior Pentagon official, believes the proposed legislation could complicate, and even delay, DOD  plans for a new bomber.  “The next bomber undoubtedly will be a very sophisticated, low-observable platform,” Gunzinger told InsideDefense.com. “ As such, its design will be inextricably intertwined with the engines that it uses.”  Gunzinger is a retired Air Force colonel who authored a study last fall that examined options for rapidly developing a new bomber.  He said a competitive engine program could lead the Pentagon to define the propulsion system for aircraft designers in the bomber competition, something he says might complicate the effort.  “This could limit options offered by the contractors, who may be in the best position to develop the most effective designs, and who in fact conduct their own competitions to determine the best integrated options for their designs,” Gunzinger said. “Moreover, a directed government engine development and competition effort could add significant unwanted time and cost to development, and the prime contractors would probably have to wait until the competition was completed before they completed their final designs, adding even more growth to the program.”

Air- and space-based sensors apparently played a vital role in helping corroborate the HUMINT and providing the assault team a detailed view of bin Laden’s compound — likely right up to the minute of the raid. “I would say, in terms of trying to get the initial confirmation of intelligence tips they got through the HUMINT, and all way up through the [final] mission planning, they would have found value in overhead assets and would have used them,” says Barry Watts, a senior analyst with the Washington, D.C.-based Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments/…/ In short, the sats sketched the infrastructure. The drones appear to have tracked the people. To tie it all together, NGA has the capability to build virtual models — computer simulations, basically — based on the data provided by the sensor systems.

Totaling the cost of the decade-long hunt for Osama bin Laden, with Todd Harrison, CSBA senior fellow.

The death of Osama bin Laden, while a tremendous boost to American morale, will have little economic or fiscal impact in the United States the way that the fall of communism had 22 years earlier /..../ "In the near term, this does not change spending at all," says Todd Harrison, a senior fellow at the nonpartisan Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments in Washington. "We still have to dismantle, disrupt Al Qaeda. And we still have a country to put back together in Afghanistan."