News
Administration’s Deficit Reduction Panel’s Recommendations
Todd Harrison believes that [the commission co-chairs] intended this draft release as a starting point for a discussion. “If you look at what they did beyond defense spending, about $400 bln. in total savings in the year 2015 to help reduce the deficit. And it is split almost equally between defense, non-defense discretionary, mandatory and tax revenue. So they really spread this around,” he pointed out.
Fewer Dragons, More Snakes
Eric Edelman, an undersecretary of defense for policy in the Bush administration, says that Afghanistan has shown the limits of what NATO can do. In “Understanding America’s Contested Primacy”, a pamphlet for the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, a Washington-based think-tank, he argues that although NATO still has value as a regional alliance, for demographic, economic and cultural reasons it will be increasingly hard pressed “to generate substantial useful military capability”. He recommends developing partnerships with countries such as India, Brazil and Australia, which may be willing and able to do more than America’s traditional allies, and which are in parts of the world that reflect today's security preoccupations.
Un-killable Programs Now Vulnerable?
The Fiscal Commission draft report is unlikely to be fully enacted by Congress, but its findings could still influence the fate of several defense programs by giving ammunition to those who are gunning for new efficiencies no matter what. The report’s recommendation to cancel the Marines’ EFV, for example, is “another nail in the coffin” for the long-gestating vehicle, says Dakota Wood of CSBA. “It certainly does seem there is a mounting set of issues, factors that do not bode well for the EFV,” Wood told Morning Defense. “My guess is the vehicle is going to be canceled.” Plus, senators have already primed the EFV for oblivion: In an unusual, but not completely unprecedented move, the Senate version of this year’s appropriations bill sets aside more than $183 million “for estimated termination costs should the program be canceled.”
Experts Predict $20 Billion in Additional Cuts as DoD Costs Rise
According to Defense News, Chairman of the Defense Business Board Michael Bayer said this means DoD will need to shift about $123 billion, rather than the original $103 billion to weapons programs, as Gates has prescribed to realize at least 1 percent growth in the defense budget over the next few years. But another Pentagon adviser, Andrew Krepinevich, president of the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, was skeptical of even those gains. “Gates may be able to hold on for a while,” he said, but predicted that “once the long knives come out,” DoD will have to reduce its budget “to address the nation’s fiscal situation.”
U.S., Afghan Seizures Make Bombmaking Harder
Improved border patrols by Afghan security forces, more U.S. troops, better tips from insurgents and intercepted communications have also resulted in more seizures, Morrison said. One seizure Sunday in Helmand province netted nearly 4,000 pounds of ammonium nitrate, the U.S. military said. The interdiction effort is worthwhile but exceptionally difficult, said Dakota Wood, a retired Marine officer and military analyst at the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments. U.S. and Afghan officials have been encouraging farmers there to raise crops to bolster the economy and denying them fertilizers runs counter to that, he said. “You can't ignore making an effort, but it will be hard to remove this from the bombmaking chain,” Wood said.
Marine Corps Faces Huge Decisions In FY-12 Budget Endgame
Gates wants the review to outline “what an expeditionary force and readiness should look like in the 21st century” amid the proliferation of long-range, anti-ship missiles, he said in an Aug. 12 address. “I think this is a strategic inflection point for the service in a number of areas,” said Dakota Wood, senior fellow at the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments